<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zaytouny, A. | 2EyesVision</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/author/zaytouny-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com</link>
	<description>Seeing is believing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 15:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Predictions of Through-Focus Performance of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Subjects Using a Visual Simulator</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/predictions-of-through-focus-performance-of-presbyopia-correcting-intraocular-lenses-in-presbyopic-subjects-using-a-visual-simulator/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/predictions-of-through-focus-performance-of-presbyopia-correcting-intraocular-lenses-in-presbyopic-subjects-using-a-visual-simulator/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Papadogiannis, P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.2eyesvision.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22999398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Purpose: To validate whether visual simulations of multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in phakic presbyopes replicate postoperative vision, and to compare performance across these lenses in the same subject. Methods: Twenty-three presbyopes with clear crystalline lenses were evaluated binocularly using SimVis Gekko visual simulator (2EyesVision).Six commercial multifocal and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-teams="true"><strong>Purpose</strong>: To validate whether visual simulations of multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in phakic presbyopes replicate postoperative vision, and to compare performance across these lenses in the same subject.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span data-teams="true"><strong>Methods</strong>: Twenty-three presbyopes with clear crystalline lenses were evaluated binocularly using SimVis Gekko visual simulator (2EyesVision).Six commercial multifocal and EDOF IOLs were simulated using the principle of temporal multiplexing: AcrySoft IQ PanOptix, FineVision POD F, AT Lisa tri, Tecnis Symfony, AcrySoft IQ Vivity, and AT Lara. Defocus visual acuity (DFVA) curves were measured for each simulated IOL under photopic conditions. Simulated IOLs were programmed from published through-focus modulation transfer function data at 15 cycles/degree. Defocus visual acuity curves through simulated IOLs were compared to average postoperative DFVA data from peer-reviewed publications (108–322 pseudophakic patients per IOL).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span data-teams="true"><strong>Results</strong>: Simulated IOLs accurately reproduced on-bench optical profiles in terms of through-focus Visual Strehl Ratio (cross-correlation &gt;0.98, RMSE &lt;0.04). Defocus visual acuity curves through simulated IOLs closely matched postoperative curves in subjects implanted with the corresponding IOL (cross-correlation ≥0.94, RMSE ≤0.07), with far vision differences ≤0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Discrepancies were largest at high near vergences (up to 0.17 logMAR). Trifocal IOLs (PanOptix, FineVision, AT Lisa) expanded DOF by ∼1.5 D compared with monofocal IOLs, while EDOF IOLs (Symfony, Vivity, AT Lara) expanded DOF by ∼0.7 D. Visual simulations replicated relative gains at intermediate/near and degradations at far, consistent with clinical outcomes in implanted patients. Intersubject variability observed in simulations</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/predictions-of-through-focus-performance-of-presbyopia-correcting-intraocular-lenses-in-presbyopic-subjects-using-a-visual-simulator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simulation of daily soft multifocal contact lenses using SimVis Gekko: from in‑vitro and computational characterization to clinical validation</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simulation-of-daily-soft-multifocal-contact-lenses-using-simvis-gekko-from-in%e2%80%91vitro-and-computational-characterization-to-clinical-validation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simulation-of-daily-soft-multifocal-contact-lenses-using-simvis-gekko-from-in%e2%80%91vitro-and-computational-characterization-to-clinical-validation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esteban Ibañez, E.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 08:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.2eyesvision.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22995015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_0 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_0 et_pb_divider_position_ et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2 id="Abstract" class="article-heading">Abstract</h2>
<p>Multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) are one of the solutions to correct presbyopia, but their adoption is not widespread. To address this situation, visual simulators can be used to refine the adaptation process. This study aims to obtain accurate simulations for a visual simulator (SimVis Gekko; 2EyesVision) of daily soft MCL designs from four manufacturers. In-vitro characterization of these MCLs—several powers and additions- was obtained using NIMO TR-1504. From the averaged relative power profiles across powers, phase maps were reconstructed and the Through-Focus Visual Strehl metric was calculated for each MCL design. The SimVis Gekko simulation corresponding to each MCL design was obtained computationally and bench-validated. Finally, the MCL simulations were clinically validated involving presbyopic patients. The clinical validation results show a good agreement between the SimVis Gekko simulations and the real MCLs for through-focus visual acuity (TF-VA) curves and VA at three real distances. All MCL designs showed a partial correlation higher than 0.90 and a Root Mean Square Error below 0.07 logMAR between the TF-VA of simulations and Real MCLs across subjects. The validity of the simulation approach using SimVis Gekko and in-vitro measurements was confirmed in this study, opening the possibility to accelerate the adaptation of MCL</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simulation-of-daily-soft-multifocal-contact-lenses-using-simvis-gekko-from-in%e2%80%91vitro-and-computational-characterization-to-clinical-validation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements (2023)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/monovision-correction-preference-and-eye-dominance-measurements/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/monovision-correction-preference-and-eye-dominance-measurements/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Lopez, V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22990548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Lopez, V.; Barcala, X.; Zaytouny, A.; Dorronsoro, C.; Peli, E.; Marcos, S. (2023). Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2023;12(3):18.doi.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_1 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_1">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_1  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_1 et_pb_divider_position_ et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_1  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<div>Rodriguez-Lopez, V.; Barcala, X.; Zaytouny, A.; Dorronsoro, C.; Peli, E.; Marcos, S. (2023);<b> Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements.</b> Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2023;12(3):18.doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.18. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2785459" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here</a>.</div></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_2  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2 class="h6 abstract-title">Abstract</h2>
<h3><strong>Purpose</strong></h3>
<p>To propose new methods for eye selection in presbyopic monovision corrections.</p>
<h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3>
<p>Twenty subjects with presbyopia performed two standard methods of binary eye dominance identification (sensory with +1.50 diopters [D ]and +0.50 D and sighting with “hole-in-the-card”) and two psychophysical methods of perceived visual quality: (1) the Preferential test, 26 natural images were judged with the near addition in one eye or in the other in a 2-interval forced-choice task, and the Eye Dominance Strength (EDS) defined as the proportion of trials where one monovision is preferred over the other; (2) the Multifocal Acceptance Score (MAS-2EV) test, the perceived quality of a natural images set (for 2 luminance levels and distances) was scored and EDS defined as the score difference between monovision in one eye or the other. Left-eye and right-eye dominance are indicated with negative and positive values, respectively. Tests were performed using a Simultaneous Vision Simulator, which allows rapid changes between corrections.</p>
<h3><strong>Results</strong></h3>
<p>Standard sensory and sighting dominances matched in only 55% of subjects. The Preferential EDS (ranging from −0.7 to +0.9) and MAS-2EV EDS (ranging from −0.6 to +0.4) were highly correlated. Selecting the eye for far in monovision with the MAS-2EV, sensory, or sighting tests would have resulted in 79%, 64%, and 43% success considering the Preferential test as the gold standard.</p>
<h3><strong>Conclusions</strong></h3>
<p>Tests based on perceptual preference allow selection of the preferred monovision correction and measurement of dominance strength.</p>
<h3><strong>Translational Relevance</strong></h3>
<p>The binocular visual simulator allows efficient implementation of eye preference tests for monovision in clinical use.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/monovision-correction-preference-and-eye-dominance-measurements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual simulations of presbyopic corrections through cataract opacification (2022)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/visual-simulations-presbyopic-cataract/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/visual-simulations-presbyopic-cataract/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcala, X.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Rego-Lorca, D., Sanchez-Quiros, J., Sanchez-Jean, R., Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M., Dorronsoro, C., &#038; Marcos, S. Journal of Cataract &#038; Refractive Surgery 2022, 10: 1097.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_2 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_2">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_2  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_2 et_pb_divider_position_ et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_3  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Rego-Lorca, D., Sanchez-Quiros, J., Sanchez-Jean, R., Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M., Dorronsoro, C., &amp; Marcos, S.;<b> Visual simulations of presbyopic corrections through cataract opacification.</b> Journal of Cataract &amp; Refractive Surgery 2022, 10: 1097. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://journals.lww.com/jcrs/Abstract/9900/Visual_simulations_of_presbyopic_corrections.82.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p>Patients can rank the perceived image quality through cataract up to high level of opacity and that the preoperative ranking of the corrections matches that performed postoperatively through transparent media.</p>
<h3><strong>Purpose</strong></h3>
<p>To study the viability of visual simulation of presbyopic correction in patients with cataract and the effect and impact of the cataract on the perceived visual quality of the different simulated presbyopic corrections preoperatively and postoperatively.</p>
<h3><strong>Setting</strong></h3>
<p>San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain.</p>
<h3><strong>Design</strong></h3>
<p>Observational, noninterventional, pilot study, early feasibility of the device being studied.</p>
<h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3>
<p>Cataract patients were tested preoperatively (n = 24) and postoperatively (n = 15) after bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). The degree of cataract was evaluated objectively with the objective scatter index (OSI). Visual acuity (VA) and perceived visual quality of natural scene images (Multifocal Acceptance Score) were measured before and after cataract surgery at far (4 m), intermediate (64 cm) and near distance (40 cm) with 4 binocular presbyopic corrections (single vision, bifocal, monovision and modified-monovision) simulated with a binocular Simultaneous Vision simulator based on temporal multiplexing.</p>
<h3><strong>Results</strong></h3>
<p>VA was significantly correlated with OSI (<em>r</em> = −0.71, <em>P</em> &lt; .0005), although the visual degradation at far for each correction was constant and not correlated with OSI. The visual benefit at near distance provided by the presbyopic correction was noticeable (23.3% ± 27.6% across corrections) for OSI &lt;5. The individual perceptual scores were highly correlated preoperatively vs postoperatively (<em>r</em> = 0.64, <em>P</em> &lt; .0005) for all corrections and distances.</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/visual-simulations-presbyopic-cataract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Binocular defocus curves with different multifocal IOLs</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/binocular-defocus-curves-data-vs-implanted/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/binocular-defocus-curves-data-vs-implanted/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcala, X.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 11:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ's]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?p=22991904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Binocular defocus curves: SimVis Gekko vs clinical data in implanted patients. High correlation (>90%) between real patients and simulation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_3 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_3">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_3  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_3 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_4  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3 style="text-align: left;"><strong>SimVis Gekko simulations vs clinical data in implanted patients</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>We incorporated real data from commercial lenses<sup>1</sup> obtained from literature in our visual simulator SimVis Gekko and measured defocus curves in presbyopic subjects. A very high correlation (&gt;90%) was found between the curves of real patients implanted with the same lenses and the simulation.</strong></p></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_image et_pb_image_0">
				
				
				
				
				<span class="et_pb_image_wrap "><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="900" height="574" src="https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Binocular-defocus-curves.jpg" alt="" title="Binocular-defocus-curves" srcset="https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Binocular-defocus-curves.jpg 900w, https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Binocular-defocus-curves-480x306.jpg 480w" sizes="(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 900px, 100vw" class="wp-image-22991905" /></span>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_5  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><strong>ESCRS 2021 Talk</strong></p></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_4 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_6  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><sup>1</sup>Sawides, Lucie, et al. &#8220;<a href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-of-multifocal-iol-designs-based-on-public-literature-data/">SimVis simulations of multifocal IOL designs based on public-literature data</a>.&#8221; Optical Design and Engineering VIII. Vol. 11871. SPIE, 2021.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>Ribeiro, Filomena, and Tiago B. Ferreira. “Comparison of clinical outcomes of 3 trifocal IOLs.” Journal of Cataract &amp; Refractive Surgery 46.9, 1247-1252 (2020).</p>
<p><sup>3</sup>Gil, M.A., Varón, C., Cardona, G. et al. “Visual acuity and defocus curves with six multifocal intraocular lenses.” Int Ophthalmol 40, 393–401 (2020).</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/binocular-defocus-curves-data-vs-implanted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SimVis simulations of multifocal IOL designs based on public-literature data (2021)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-multifocal-iol-designs/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-multifocal-iol-designs/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sawides, L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 09:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sawides, L., de Castro, A., Lago, C. M., Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Marcos, S., &#038; Dorronsoro, C. Optical Design and Engineering VIII (Vol. 11871, pp. 122-132). SPIE. (2021 Sept.)]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_4 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_4">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_4  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_5 et_pb_divider_position_ et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_7  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Sawides, L., de Castro, A., Lago, C. M., Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Marcos, S., &amp; Dorronsoro, C.; <b>SimVis simulations of multifocal IOL designs based on public-literature data. </b>Optical Design and Engineering VIII (Vol. 11871, pp. 122-132). SPIE. (2021 Sept.). For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11871/118710O/SimVis-simulations-of-multifocal-IOL-designs-based-on-public-literature/10.1117/12.2595035.short?SSO=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p>As a large variety of intraocular lens (IOL) designs is commercially available in a growing market, selecting the best IOL for each patient has become a crucial task for a positive surgical outcome. Information about the measured or estimated performance of commercial lenses, as the through-focus modulation transfer function (TF-MTF) at a given frequency and pupil diameter, is routinely published. SimVis Gekko, a see-through simultaneous vision simulator based on temporal multiplexing, allows patients to experience the real world through different multifocal corrections prior to surgery. Implementing the maximum number of commercially available IOL designs into the portfolio of SimVis Gekko simulations is needed to provide a complete experience for the patients. We developed a new method to visually simulate IOL designs using temporal multiplexing, based only on publicly available information (mainly scientific literature or regulatory information), using the TF-MTF at 15cpd as input data to estimate the temporal coefficients that provide the best approximation to the real lens design. We validated the method with synthetic phase maps of equal area segmented bifocal and trifocal multifocal corrections for three pupil diameters of 3mm, 3.75mm and 4.5mm and applied it to three commercially available IOLs (trifocal or extended-depth-of-focus lenses). Through-focus visual acuity (TF-VA) curves were measured in seven patients using the SimVis simulations in the SimVis Gekko and matched, on average, the through-focus VA measurements in patients with implanted IOLs, reported in the scientific literature (on average logMAR RMS error=0.05, corresponding to less than 3 letters of visual acuity charts).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Keywords</h3>
<h4>Simultaneous vision; Temporal multiplexing; Visual simulations; MTF; Visual Strehl; Multifocal IOL designs; Through-focus optical quality</h4></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-multifocal-iol-designs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SimVis simulation of Lasik corneal ablation patterns for presbyopia correction</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/lasik/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/lasik/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siso, I.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ's]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?p=22991937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SimVis Gekko extends depth of focus by 1.75D, simulating PresbyMAX. Reliable simulator for presbyopic corneal ablation patterns before surgery.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_5 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_5">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_5  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_6 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_8  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3>Computational, on-bench and clinical validations</h3>
<p>The binocular defocus curve through SimVis Gekko simulating PresbyMAX Hybrid (by Schwind), extends the depth of focus by around 1.75D compared to the bilateral monofocal correction for far, maintaining a binocular VA above 0.2 LogMAR.</p>
<p>SimVis Gekko is a reliable visual simulator able to accurately simulate presbyopic corneal ablation patterns before surgery.</div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_image et_pb_image_1">
				
				
				
				
				<span class="et_pb_image_wrap "><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="900" height="574" src="https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/lasik-1.jpg" alt="" title="lasik" srcset="https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/lasik-1.jpg 900w, https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/lasik-1-480x306.jpg 480w" sizes="(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 900px, 100vw" class="wp-image-22991942" /></span>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_9  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><strong>ESCRS 2022 E-Poster, PO465 <br /></strong>Submission No:  FP-2534</p></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_7 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_10  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><sup>1</sup>Akondi, Vyas, et al. &#8220;<strong><a href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/experimental-validations-of-a-tunable-lens-based-visual-demonstrator-of-multifocal-corrections/">Experimental validations of a tunable-lens-based visual demonstrator of multifocal corrections</a></strong>.&#8221; Biomedical Optics Express 9.12 (2018): 6302-6317</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>Luger, Michiel HA, et al. &#8220;Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments.&#8221; American Journal of Ophthalmology 160.3 (2015): 493-505.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/lasik/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
