<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schwiegerling, J. | 2EyesVision</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/author/schwiegerling-j/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com</link>
	<description>Seeing is believing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics (2017)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/comparison-of-vision-through-surface-modulated-and-spatial-light-modulated-multifocal-optics/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/comparison-of-vision-through-surface-modulated-and-spatial-light-modulated-multifocal-optics/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinas, M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 09:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vinas M, Dorronsoro C, Radhakrishnan A, Benedi-Garcia C, LaVilla EA, Schwiegerling J, et al. Biomed Opt Express 2017 Mar 3;8(4):2055-2068.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="Abs1" class="c-article-section__title js-section-title js-c-reading-companion-sections-item">Citation</h2>
<p>5. Vinas M, Dorronsoro C, Radhakrishnan A, Benedi-Garcia C, LaVilla EA, Schwiegerling J, et al. <b>Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics.</b> Biomed Opt Express 2017 Mar 3;8(4):2055-2068. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.osapublishing.org/boe/abstract.cfm?uri=boe-8-4-2055" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 id="Abstract" class="article-heading">Abstract</h2>
<p>Spatial-light-modulators (SLM) are increasingly used as active elements in adaptive optics (AO) systems to simulate optical corrections, in particular multifocal presbyopic corrections. In this study, we compared vision with lathe-manufactured multi-zone (2-4) multifocal, angularly and radially, segmented surfaces and through the same corrections simulated with a SLM in a custom-developed two-active-element AO visual simulator. We found that perceived visual quality measured through real manufactured surfaces and SLM-simulated phase maps corresponded highly. Optical simulations predicted differences in perceived visual quality across different designs at Far distance, but showed some discrepancies at intermediate and near.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>©2017 Optical Society of America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/comparison-of-vision-through-surface-modulated-and-spatial-light-modulated-multifocal-optics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
