<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marcos, S | 2EyesVision</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/author/marcos-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com</link>
	<description>Seeing is believing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 15:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Predictions of Through-Focus Performance of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Subjects Using a Visual Simulator</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/predictions-of-through-focus-performance-of-presbyopia-correcting-intraocular-lenses-in-presbyopic-subjects-using-a-visual-simulator/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/predictions-of-through-focus-performance-of-presbyopia-correcting-intraocular-lenses-in-presbyopic-subjects-using-a-visual-simulator/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Papadogiannis, P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.2eyesvision.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22999398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Purpose: To validate whether visual simulations of multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in phakic presbyopes replicate postoperative vision, and to compare performance across these lenses in the same subject. Methods: Twenty-three presbyopes with clear crystalline lenses were evaluated binocularly using SimVis Gekko visual simulator (2EyesVision).Six commercial multifocal and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-teams="true"><strong>Purpose</strong>: To validate whether visual simulations of multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in phakic presbyopes replicate postoperative vision, and to compare performance across these lenses in the same subject.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span data-teams="true"><strong>Methods</strong>: Twenty-three presbyopes with clear crystalline lenses were evaluated binocularly using SimVis Gekko visual simulator (2EyesVision).Six commercial multifocal and EDOF IOLs were simulated using the principle of temporal multiplexing: AcrySoft IQ PanOptix, FineVision POD F, AT Lisa tri, Tecnis Symfony, AcrySoft IQ Vivity, and AT Lara. Defocus visual acuity (DFVA) curves were measured for each simulated IOL under photopic conditions. Simulated IOLs were programmed from published through-focus modulation transfer function data at 15 cycles/degree. Defocus visual acuity curves through simulated IOLs were compared to average postoperative DFVA data from peer-reviewed publications (108–322 pseudophakic patients per IOL).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span data-teams="true"><strong>Results</strong>: Simulated IOLs accurately reproduced on-bench optical profiles in terms of through-focus Visual Strehl Ratio (cross-correlation &gt;0.98, RMSE &lt;0.04). Defocus visual acuity curves through simulated IOLs closely matched postoperative curves in subjects implanted with the corresponding IOL (cross-correlation ≥0.94, RMSE ≤0.07), with far vision differences ≤0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Discrepancies were largest at high near vergences (up to 0.17 logMAR). Trifocal IOLs (PanOptix, FineVision, AT Lisa) expanded DOF by ∼1.5 D compared with monofocal IOLs, while EDOF IOLs (Symfony, Vivity, AT Lara) expanded DOF by ∼0.7 D. Visual simulations replicated relative gains at intermediate/near and degradations at far, consistent with clinical outcomes in implanted patients. Intersubject variability observed in simulations</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/predictions-of-through-focus-performance-of-presbyopia-correcting-intraocular-lenses-in-presbyopic-subjects-using-a-visual-simulator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optical beam scanner with reconfigurable non-mechanical control of beam position, angle, and focus for low-cost whole-eye OCT imaging (2023)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/optical-beam-low-cost-eye-oct-imaging/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/optical-beam-low-cost-eye-oct-imaging/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Urizar, P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 08:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.2eyesvision.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22993599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[María Pilar Urizar, Enrique Gambra, Alberto de Castro, Álvaro de la Peña, Onur Cetinkaya, Susana Marcos, and Andrea Curatolo · Optica. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_0 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_0 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2 id="Abstract" class="article-heading">Abstract</h2>
<p>Whole-eye optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging is a promising tool in ocular biometry for cataract surgery planning, glaucoma diagnostics and myopia progression studies. However, conventional OCT systems are set up to perform either anterior or posterior eye segment scans and cannot easily switch between the two scan configurations without adding or exchanging optical components to account for the refraction of the eye’s optics. Even in state-of-the-art whole-eye OCT systems, the scan configurations are pre-selected and cannot be dynamically reconfigured. In this work, we present the design, optimization and experimental validation of a reconfigurable and low-cost optical beam scanner based on three electro-tunable lenses, capable of non-mechanically controlling the beam position, angle and focus. We derive the analytical theory behind its control. We demonstrate its use in performing alternate anterior and posterior segment imaging by seamlessly switching between a telecentric focused beam scan to an angular collimated beam scan. We characterize the corresponding beam profiles and record whole-eye OCT images in a model eye and in an <i>ex vivo</i> rabbit eye, observing features comparable to those obtained with conventional anterior and posterior OCT scanners. The proposed beam scanner reduces the complexity and cost of other whole-eye scanners and is well suited for 2-D ocular biometry. Additionally, with the added versatility of seamless scan reconfiguration, its use can be easily expanded to other ophthalmic applications and beyond.</p>
<p>© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OA_License_v2#VOR-OA" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement</a></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/optical-beam-low-cost-eye-oct-imaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements (2023)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/monovision-correction-preference-and-eye-dominance-measurements/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/monovision-correction-preference-and-eye-dominance-measurements/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Lopez, V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22990548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Lopez, V.; Barcala, X.; Zaytouny, A.; Dorronsoro, C.; Peli, E.; Marcos, S. (2023). Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2023;12(3):18.doi.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_1 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_1">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_1  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_1 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_1  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<div>Rodriguez-Lopez, V.; Barcala, X.; Zaytouny, A.; Dorronsoro, C.; Peli, E.; Marcos, S. (2023);<b> Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements.</b> Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2023;12(3):18.doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.18. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2785459" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here</a>.</div></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_2  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2 class="h6 abstract-title">Abstract</h2>
<h3><strong>Purpose</strong></h3>
<p>To propose new methods for eye selection in presbyopic monovision corrections.</p>
<h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3>
<p>Twenty subjects with presbyopia performed two standard methods of binary eye dominance identification (sensory with +1.50 diopters [D ]and +0.50 D and sighting with “hole-in-the-card”) and two psychophysical methods of perceived visual quality: (1) the Preferential test, 26 natural images were judged with the near addition in one eye or in the other in a 2-interval forced-choice task, and the Eye Dominance Strength (EDS) defined as the proportion of trials where one monovision is preferred over the other; (2) the Multifocal Acceptance Score (MAS-2EV) test, the perceived quality of a natural images set (for 2 luminance levels and distances) was scored and EDS defined as the score difference between monovision in one eye or the other. Left-eye and right-eye dominance are indicated with negative and positive values, respectively. Tests were performed using a Simultaneous Vision Simulator, which allows rapid changes between corrections.</p>
<h3><strong>Results</strong></h3>
<p>Standard sensory and sighting dominances matched in only 55% of subjects. The Preferential EDS (ranging from −0.7 to +0.9) and MAS-2EV EDS (ranging from −0.6 to +0.4) were highly correlated. Selecting the eye for far in monovision with the MAS-2EV, sensory, or sighting tests would have resulted in 79%, 64%, and 43% success considering the Preferential test as the gold standard.</p>
<h3><strong>Conclusions</strong></h3>
<p>Tests based on perceptual preference allow selection of the preferred monovision correction and measurement of dominance strength.</p>
<h3><strong>Translational Relevance</strong></h3>
<p>The binocular visual simulator allows efficient implementation of eye preference tests for monovision in clinical use.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/monovision-correction-preference-and-eye-dominance-measurements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multifocal contact lens vision simulated with a clinical binocular simulator (2022)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/multifocal-contact-lens-visual-simulator/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/multifocal-contact-lens-visual-simulator/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcala, X.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 15:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to compare the binocular visual perception of participants wearing multifocal contact lenses and visual simulator.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_2 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_2">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_2  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_2 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_3  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Barcala, X., Vinas, M., Ruiz, S., Hidalgo, F., Nankivil, D., Karkkainen, T., Gambra, E., Dorronsoro, D., &amp; Marcos, S.;<b> Multifocal contact lens vision simulated with a clinical binocular simulator.</b> Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 2022, 45(6):101716. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367048422001618" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<h2></h2>
<h2 class="section-title u-h4 u-margin-l-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Abstract</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="as005">
<h3 id="st010" class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3>
<p id="sp0005">The purpose of this study is to compare the binocular visual perception of participants wearing multifocal contact lenses and these same lens designs viewed through a temporal multiplexing visual simulator.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div id="as010">
<h3 id="st015" class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3>
<p id="sp0010">Visual performance and perceived visual quality at various distances were obtained in 37 participants wearing soft M−CLs and through the SimVis Gekko programmed with the same lenses. In a pilot study (n = 10) visual performance was measured in terms of LogMAR visual acuity (VA) at far (4 m), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) distances and through-focus VA (TFVA) curves with the simulated M−CLs. In the follow-up study (n = 27), LogMAR VA at far, intermediate and near distances were measured both with the actual and simulated M−CLs. Perceived visual quality was measured in both studies using the Multifocal Acceptance Score (MAS-2EV), and a Participants Reported Outcomes Vision questionnaire. Differences between the metrics obtained with simulated and actual lenses were obtained.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div id="as015">
<h3 id="st020" class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3>
<p id="sp0015">Both actual and simulated M−CLs increased depth-of-focus by a similar amount. Mean LogMAR VA differences with actual and simulated M−CLs ranged between 4 and 6 letters (0.08 ± 0.01, 0.12 ± 0.01 and 0.10 ± 0.01, for far, intermediate and near distances, respectively). MAS-2EV average score differences with actual and simulated M−CLs ranged between −1.00 and + 4.25. Average MAS-2EV scores were not correlated significantly with VA. However, MAS-2EV (average and individual scores) were highly correlated to visual quality questionnaire responses (p &lt; 0.005).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div id="as020">
<h3 id="st025" class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3>
<p id="sp0020">A simultaneous vision simulator accurately represented vision with M−CLs both VA at various distances and perceived visual quality, as measured in a clinical setting. The MAS-2EV metric accurately captured participant reported outcomes of standard vision questionnaires. The combination of SimVis Gekko and MAS-2EV has the potential to largely reduce chair time in M−CLs fitting.</p>
</div></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/multifocal-contact-lens-visual-simulator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluating the effect of ocular aberrations on the simulated performance of a new refractive IOL design using adaptive optics (2022)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/evaluating-the-effect-of-ocular-aberrations-on-the-simulated-performance-of-a-new-refractive-iol-design-using-adaptive-optics/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/evaluating-the-effect-of-ocular-aberrations-on-the-simulated-performance-of-a-new-refractive-iol-design-using-adaptive-optics/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lago, C. M., de Castro, A., Benedí-García, C., Aissati, S., &#038; Marcos, S. (2022). Biomedical Optics Express 2022, 13(12), 6682-6694.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_3 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_3">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_3  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_3 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_4  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2 id="Abstract" class="article-heading">Citation</h2>
<p>Lago, C. M., de Castro, A., Benedí-García, C., Aissati, S., &amp; Marcos, S. (2022).;<b> Evaluating the effect of ocular aberrations on the simulated performance of a new refractive IOL design using adaptive optics.</b> Biomedical Optics Express 2022, 13(12), 6682-6694. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://opg.optica.org/boe/fulltext.cfm?uri=boe-13-12-6682&amp;id=522104" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 class="article-heading">Abstract</h2>
<p>Adaptive optics (AO) visual simulators are excellent platforms for non-invasive simulation visual performance with new intraocular lens (IOL) designs, in combination with a subject own ocular aberrations and brain. We measured the through focus visual acuity in subjects through a new refractive IOL physically inserted in a cuvette and projected onto the eye’s pupil, while aberrations were manipulated (corrected, or positive/negative spherical aberration added) using a deformable mirror (DM) in a custom-developed AO simulator. The IOL increased depth-of-focus (DOF) to 1.53 ± 0.21D, while maintaining high Visual Acuity (VA, -0.07 ± 0.05), averaged across subjects and conditions. Modifying the aberrations did not alter IOL performance on average.</p>
<p>© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OA_License_v2#VOR-OA" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement</a></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/evaluating-the-effect-of-ocular-aberrations-on-the-simulated-performance-of-a-new-refractive-iol-design-using-adaptive-optics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual simulations of presbyopic corrections through cataract opacification (2022)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/visual-simulations-presbyopic-cataract/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/visual-simulations-presbyopic-cataract/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcala, X.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Rego-Lorca, D., Sanchez-Quiros, J., Sanchez-Jean, R., Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M., Dorronsoro, C., &#038; Marcos, S. Journal of Cataract &#038; Refractive Surgery 2022, 10: 1097.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_4 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_4">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_4  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_4 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_5  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Rego-Lorca, D., Sanchez-Quiros, J., Sanchez-Jean, R., Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M., Dorronsoro, C., &amp; Marcos, S.;<b> Visual simulations of presbyopic corrections through cataract opacification.</b> Journal of Cataract &amp; Refractive Surgery 2022, 10: 1097. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://journals.lww.com/jcrs/Abstract/9900/Visual_simulations_of_presbyopic_corrections.82.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p>Patients can rank the perceived image quality through cataract up to high level of opacity and that the preoperative ranking of the corrections matches that performed postoperatively through transparent media.</p>
<h3><strong>Purpose</strong></h3>
<p>To study the viability of visual simulation of presbyopic correction in patients with cataract and the effect and impact of the cataract on the perceived visual quality of the different simulated presbyopic corrections preoperatively and postoperatively.</p>
<h3><strong>Setting</strong></h3>
<p>San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain.</p>
<h3><strong>Design</strong></h3>
<p>Observational, noninterventional, pilot study, early feasibility of the device being studied.</p>
<h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3>
<p>Cataract patients were tested preoperatively (n = 24) and postoperatively (n = 15) after bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). The degree of cataract was evaluated objectively with the objective scatter index (OSI). Visual acuity (VA) and perceived visual quality of natural scene images (Multifocal Acceptance Score) were measured before and after cataract surgery at far (4 m), intermediate (64 cm) and near distance (40 cm) with 4 binocular presbyopic corrections (single vision, bifocal, monovision and modified-monovision) simulated with a binocular Simultaneous Vision simulator based on temporal multiplexing.</p>
<h3><strong>Results</strong></h3>
<p>VA was significantly correlated with OSI (<em>r</em> = −0.71, <em>P</em> &lt; .0005), although the visual degradation at far for each correction was constant and not correlated with OSI. The visual benefit at near distance provided by the presbyopic correction was noticeable (23.3% ± 27.6% across corrections) for OSI &lt;5. The individual perceptual scores were highly correlated preoperatively vs postoperatively (<em>r</em> = 0.64, <em>P</em> &lt; .0005) for all corrections and distances.</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/visual-simulations-presbyopic-cataract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optical and visual quality of real intraocular lenses physically projected on the patient’s eye (2021)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/optical-visual-real-intraocular-lenses/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/optical-visual-real-intraocular-lenses/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benedí-García, C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Benedi-Garcia, C., Vinas, M., Lago, C. M., Aissati S., De Castro, A., Dorronsoro, C, and Marcos, S. Biomed. Opt. Express 12, 6360-6374 (2021).]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_5 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_5">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_5  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_5 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_6  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Benedi-Garcia, C., Vinas, M., Lago, C. M., Aissati S., De Castro, A., Dorronsoro, C, and Marcos, S.; <b>Optical and visual quality of real intraocular lenses physically projected on the patient’s eye. </b>Biomed. Opt. Express 12, 6360-6374 (2021). For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.osapublishing.org/boe/fulltext.cfm?uri=boe-12-10-6360&amp;id=459204" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 id="Abstract" class="article-heading">Abstract</h2>
<p>Visual simulators aim at evaluating vision with ophthalmic corrections prior to prescription or implantation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the patient’s eye. In the present study, we present the design, implementation, and validation of a new IOL-in-cuvette channel in an Adaptive Optics visual simulator, which provides an alternative channel for pre-operative simulation of vision with IOLs. The IOL is projected on the pupil’s plane of the subject by using a Rassow system. A second lens, the Rassow lens, compensates for an IOL of 20 D while other powers can be corrected with a Badal system within a 5 D range. The new channel was evaluated by through-focus (TF) optical quality in an artificial eye on bench, and by TF visual acuity in patients, with various IOL designs (monofocal, diffractive trifocal, and refractive extended depth of focus).</p>
<p>©2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OA_License_v1#VOR-OA" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement</a></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/optical-visual-real-intraocular-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Binocular defocus curves with different multifocal IOLs</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/binocular-defocus-curves-data-vs-implanted/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/binocular-defocus-curves-data-vs-implanted/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcala, X.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 11:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ's]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?p=22991904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Binocular defocus curves: SimVis Gekko vs clinical data in implanted patients. High correlation (>90%) between real patients and simulation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_6 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_6">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_6  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_6 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_7  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h3 style="text-align: left;"><strong>SimVis Gekko simulations vs clinical data in implanted patients</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>We incorporated real data from commercial lenses<sup>1</sup> obtained from literature in our visual simulator SimVis Gekko and measured defocus curves in presbyopic subjects. A very high correlation (&gt;90%) was found between the curves of real patients implanted with the same lenses and the simulation.</strong></p></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_image et_pb_image_0">
				
				
				
				
				<span class="et_pb_image_wrap "><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="900" height="574" src="https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Binocular-defocus-curves.jpg" alt="" title="Binocular-defocus-curves" srcset="https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Binocular-defocus-curves.jpg 900w, https://www.2eyesvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Binocular-defocus-curves-480x306.jpg 480w" sizes="(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 900px, 100vw" class="wp-image-22991905" /></span>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_8  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><strong>ESCRS 2021 Talk</strong></p></div>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_7 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_9  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><sup>1</sup>Sawides, Lucie, et al. &#8220;<a href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-of-multifocal-iol-designs-based-on-public-literature-data/">SimVis simulations of multifocal IOL designs based on public-literature data</a>.&#8221; Optical Design and Engineering VIII. Vol. 11871. SPIE, 2021.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>Ribeiro, Filomena, and Tiago B. Ferreira. “Comparison of clinical outcomes of 3 trifocal IOLs.” Journal of Cataract &amp; Refractive Surgery 46.9, 1247-1252 (2020).</p>
<p><sup>3</sup>Gil, M.A., Varón, C., Cardona, G. et al. “Visual acuity and defocus curves with six multifocal intraocular lenses.” Int Ophthalmol 40, 393–401 (2020).</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/binocular-defocus-curves-data-vs-implanted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SimVis simulations of multifocal IOL designs based on public-literature data (2021)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-multifocal-iol-designs/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-multifocal-iol-designs/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sawides, L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 09:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sawides, L., de Castro, A., Lago, C. M., Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Marcos, S., &#038; Dorronsoro, C. Optical Design and Engineering VIII (Vol. 11871, pp. 122-132). SPIE. (2021 Sept.)]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_7 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_7">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_7  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_8 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_10  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Sawides, L., de Castro, A., Lago, C. M., Barcala, X., Zaytouny, A., Marcos, S., &amp; Dorronsoro, C.; <b>SimVis simulations of multifocal IOL designs based on public-literature data. </b>Optical Design and Engineering VIII (Vol. 11871, pp. 122-132). SPIE. (2021 Sept.). For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11871/118710O/SimVis-simulations-of-multifocal-IOL-designs-based-on-public-literature/10.1117/12.2595035.short?SSO=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p>As a large variety of intraocular lens (IOL) designs is commercially available in a growing market, selecting the best IOL for each patient has become a crucial task for a positive surgical outcome. Information about the measured or estimated performance of commercial lenses, as the through-focus modulation transfer function (TF-MTF) at a given frequency and pupil diameter, is routinely published. SimVis Gekko, a see-through simultaneous vision simulator based on temporal multiplexing, allows patients to experience the real world through different multifocal corrections prior to surgery. Implementing the maximum number of commercially available IOL designs into the portfolio of SimVis Gekko simulations is needed to provide a complete experience for the patients. We developed a new method to visually simulate IOL designs using temporal multiplexing, based only on publicly available information (mainly scientific literature or regulatory information), using the TF-MTF at 15cpd as input data to estimate the temporal coefficients that provide the best approximation to the real lens design. We validated the method with synthetic phase maps of equal area segmented bifocal and trifocal multifocal corrections for three pupil diameters of 3mm, 3.75mm and 4.5mm and applied it to three commercially available IOLs (trifocal or extended-depth-of-focus lenses). Through-focus visual acuity (TF-VA) curves were measured in seven patients using the SimVis simulations in the SimVis Gekko and matched, on average, the through-focus VA measurements in patients with implanted IOLs, reported in the scientific literature (on average logMAR RMS error=0.05, corresponding to less than 3 letters of visual acuity charts).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Keywords</h3>
<h4>Simultaneous vision; Temporal multiplexing; Visual simulations; MTF; Visual Strehl; Multifocal IOL designs; Through-focus optical quality</h4></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simvis-simulations-multifocal-iol-designs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simulating Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Important Advances in Ophthalmology (2021)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simulating-outcomes-cataract-surgery/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simulating-outcomes-cataract-surgery/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcos, S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Marcos, S., Martinez, E., Vinas, M., de Castro, A., Dorronsoro, C., Pil Bang, S., Yoon, G., Artal, P. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2021.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_8 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_8">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_8  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_9 et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_11  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2>Citation</h2>
<p>Marcos, S., Martinez-Enriquez, E., Vinas, M., de Castro, A., Dorronsoro, C., Pil Bang, S., Yoon, G., Artal, P.; <b>Simulating Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Important Advances in Ophthalmology. </b>Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2021 23:1, 277-306. For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082420-035827" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Abstract</h2>
<p>As the human eye ages, the crystalline lens stiffens (presbyopia) and opacifies (cataract), requiring its replacement with an artificial lens [intraocular lens (IOL)]. Cataract surgery is the most frequently performed surgical procedure in the world. The increase in IOL designs has not been paralleled in practice by a sophistication in IOL selection methods, which rely on limited anatomical measurements of the eye and the surgeon’s interpretation of the patient’s needs and expectations. We propose that the future of IOL selection will be guided by 3D quantitative imaging of the crystalline lens to map lens opacities, anticipate IOL position, and develop fully customized eye models for ray-tracing-based IOL selection. Conversely, visual simulators (in which IOL designs are programmed in active elements) allow patients to experience prospective vision before surgery and to make more informed decisions about which IOL to choose. Quantitative imaging and optical and visual simulations of postsurgery outcomes will allow optimal treatments to be selected for a patient undergoing modern cataract surgery.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Keywords</h3>
<h4>intraocular lens; cataract surgery; anterior segment imaging; optical coherence tomography; visual simulation; adaptive optics</h4></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/simulating-outcomes-cataract-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
