<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Garzon, N. | 2EyesVision</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.2eyesvision.com/author/garzon-n/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com</link>
	<description>Seeing is believing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision  (2019)</title>
		<link>https://www.2eyesvision.com/pre-operative-simulation-of-post-operative-multifocal-vision/</link>
					<comments>https://www.2eyesvision.com/pre-operative-simulation-of-post-operative-multifocal-vision/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinas, M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://talentiam-programs.com/?post_type=project&#038;p=22988888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vinas M, Aissati S, Romero M, Benedi-Garcia C, Garzon N, Poyales F, Dorronsoro C, Marcos S. Biomed. Opt. Express 10, 5801-5817 (2019).]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_0 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_divider et_pb_divider_0 et_pb_divider_position_ et_pb_space"><div class="et_pb_divider_internal"></div></div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2 id="Abstract" class="article-heading">Citation</h2>
<p>11. Vinas M, Aissati S, Romero M, Benedi-Garcia C, Garzon N, Poyales F, Dorronsoro C, Marcos S. <b>Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision.</b> Biomed. Opt. Express 10, 5801-5817 (2019) For more information, <a class="link_loma" href="https://www.osapublishing.org/boe/abstract.cfm?uri=boe-10-11-5801" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 class="article-heading">Abstract</h2>
<p>While multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) are increasingly implanted to correct for presbyopia, how one sees with a multifocal correction is hard to explain and imagine. The current study evaluates the quality of various visual simulating technologies by comparing vision with simulated MIOLs pre-operatively and the implanted MIOLs post-operatively in the same patients. Two simulation platforms were used: (1) a custom-developed adaptiveoptics (AO) system, with two visual simulator devices: a spatial light modulator (SLM) and an optotunable lens operating under temporal multiplexing (SimVis); and (2) a wearable, binocular, large field of view SimVis2Eyes clinical simulator (SimVis Gekko, 2Eyes Vision, Madrid, Spain). All devices were programmed to simulate a trifocal diffractive MIOL (POD F, FineVision, PhysIOL). Eight patients were measured pre-operatively simulating the trifocal lens and post-operatively with implantation of the same MIOL. Through-focus decimal visual acuity (TF VA) was measured (1) monocularly in monochromatic light using a four-alternative-forced-choice procedure in the AO system; and (2) binocularly using a clinical optotype in white light. Visual simulations pre-operatively predict well the TF VA performance found post-operatively in patients implanted with the real IOL. The average RMS difference between TF curves with the different visual simulators was 0.05 ± 0.01. The average RMS difference between the TF VA curves with the SimVis pre-operatively and the real MIOL post-operatively was 0.06 ± 0.01 in both platforms, and it was higher in cataract eyes (0.08 ± 0.01, on average across simulators) than in eyes with clear lens. In either group the shape of the TF curves is similar across simulators and pre- and post-operatively. TF curves cross-correlated significantly between simulators (lag k = 0, rho = 0.889), as well as with results with the real MIOL implanted (lag k = 0, rho = 0.853). Visual simulations are useful programmable tools to predict visual performance with MIOLs, both in an AO environment and in a clinical simulator. Pre-operative visual simulations and post-operative data are in good agreement.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/OA_License_v1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement</a></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.2eyesvision.com/pre-operative-simulation-of-post-operative-multifocal-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
